72

This was my morning sipdown a little earlier. I have been making a concerted effort to finish the Vahdam samples I recently received and get reviews for each of them posted in a timely fashion. Of the bunch, this one was strange. It was completely unlike any of the others I have recently tried.

I prepared this tea Western style. I steeped 1 teaspoon of loose tea leaves in 8 ounces of 194 F water for 5 minutes. I did not attempt any additional infusions.

Prior to infusion, the dry tea leaves gave off unexpected aromas of grass, hay, smoke, and dried flowers. After infusion, the tea took on a smokier, woodier, nuttier character with faintly grassy, vegetal undertones. I did not pick up on Muscatel at all. In the mouth, I immediately detected notes of almond, roasted peanut, smoke, grass, hay, honey, malt, and wood underscored by traces of stewed legumes, nutmeg, and dried flowers. The finish was predictably vegetal, grassy, nutty, and woody, though I could detect a slightly stronger floral presence (tea blossoms and chrysanthemum) that lingered briefly after the swallow. I again could not come up with any Muscatel presence whatsoever.

This tea was so odd. It has never been unusual for me to find nutty, grassy, and vegetal characteristics in many first and second flush Darjeelings, but what was so shocking here was not only how pronounced these presences were, but how there was no discernible Muscatel character to provide balance. This tea reminded me a lot of the Gopaldhara “Moondrop” First Flush Darjeeling from Tealyra that I reviewed fairly recently, except this tea was smokier, grassier, and more vegetal. I was torn on that tea and I am only somewhat less torn on this one. I appreciated how unique it was, but at the same time, it did not really offer what I look for in a first flush Darjeeling.

Flavors: Almond, Flowers, Grass, Hay, Honey, Malt, Nutmeg, Roasted Nuts, Smoke, Vegetables, Wood

Preparation
5 min, 0 sec 1 tsp 8 OZ / 236 ML

Login or sign up to leave a comment.

People who liked this

Login or sign up to leave a comment.

Profile

Bio

My grading criteria for tea is as follows:

90-100: Exceptional. I love this stuff. If I can get it, I will drink it pretty much every day.

80-89: Very good. I really like this stuff and wouldn’t mind keeping it around for regular consumption.

70-79: Good. I like this stuff, but may or may not reach for it regularly.

60-69: Solid. I rather like this stuff and think it’s a little bit better-than-average. I’ll drink it with no complaints, but am more likely to reach for something I find more enjoyable than revisit it with regularity.

50-59: Average. I find this stuff to be more or less okay, but it is highly doubtful that I will revisit it in the near future if at all.

40-49: A little below average. I don’t really care for this tea and likely won’t have it again.

39 and lower: Varying degrees of yucky.

Don’t be surprised if my average scores are a bit on the high side because I tend to know what I like and what I dislike and will steer clear of teas I am likely to find unappealing.

Location

KY

Following These People

Moderator Tools

Mark as Spammer